
Any postwar NATO presence in Afghanistan must ensure billions of dollars in security aid are properly disbursed, alliance officials told The New York Times. Because of the need to safeguard more than $4 billion of financial aid that will flow annually from being squandered or pilfered in a country plagued by corruption, officials of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are planning a postwar force with more military managers and fewer combat trainers, the report said. The issue relates to plans after NATO and U.S. forces end their combat operations in Afghanistan at the end of next year. Without plans that would have U.S. and NATO troops positioned at Afghan military and police headquarters to oversee how the money is spent, the newspaper said NATO officials fear the U.S. Congress and European parliaments might cancel their financial commitments. The report said the issue arises as military commanders want the postwar effort to concentrate on training and advising Afghans with NATO troops spread across the battlefield, while political leaders in Washington and in NATO countries prefer fewer troops only at large Afghan headquarters. Any enduring NATO military presence in Afghanistan "is tied directly to the $4.1 billion and our ability to oversee it and account for it," a senior NATO diplomat told the Times. He said financing of Afghan security forces is important to prevent political chaos and factional bloodshed that could result after the coalition forces leave. The report said NATO proposes an enduring presence of as many as 12,000 troops, with two-thirds made up of U.S. forces. That number would be below what the military commanders have recommended but senior NATO official told the newspaper larger numbers are unnecessary given the more limited goals being set by political leaders. Any postwar plan would come only after a security agreement is concluded between the United States and Afghanistan. Such an agreement would deal with the number, role and legal protection of U.S. troops. Because of problems concluding a deal, Washington may opt for stationing zero number of U.S. troops. However, The Times said both U.S. and alliance officials remain guardedly optimistic an agreement would be concluded eventually because of Afghanistan's desire for billions of dollars in assistance. The report said NATO plans call for its military personnel to be assigned to the headquarters of the defense and interior ministries, the six Afghan National Army corps headquarters and to the similar number of national police headquarters. They would also be well represented in army and police training institutions. The report said Pentagon officials want at least some American commandos to remain to carry out counterterrorism missions, unilaterally or in coordination with Afghan forces.
GMT 15:34 2018 Friday ,14 December
Moscow ready for Putin-Trump meetingGMT 13:40 2018 Friday ,14 December
Britain and EU should prepare for second Brexit referendumGMT 11:43 2018 Friday ,14 December
Kosovo to build an army amid tensions with SerbiaGMT 11:52 2018 Thursday ,13 December
Britain's May to appeal to EU for help to salvage Brexit dealGMT 10:28 2018 Wednesday ,12 December
Huawei Executive Gets Bail In Case Rattling China TiesGMT 09:01 2018 Tuesday ,11 December
US marines missing after aircraft collision off Japan confirmed deadGMT 08:55 2018 Monday ,10 December
Top EU court to issue decision on reversal of BrexitGMT 08:37 2018 Monday ,10 December
Peruvians vote for anti-corruption reforms
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2025 ©
Maintained and developed by Arabs Today Group SAL.
All rights reserved to Arab Today Media Group 2025 ©
Send your comments
Your comment as a visitor